Matthew Scarborough

Wolf vs. Progressive

  • By: Scarborough Attorneys at Law
  • Published: June 1, 2010

In the case of Wolf vs. Progressive, 35Fla. L. Weekly D733(Fla. 1st DCA 2010), the District Court held that a Plaintiff who sued for UM Benefits was not entitled to them simply because he did not receive notice of the availability of UM Benefits on a six month notice of renewal.  According to the 1st District, “We do not read the plain language of section 627.727(1)2 require that notice of UM coverage availability be sent more frequently than annually, even where, as here, the insured’s policy renews every six months.”  Clearly this ruling is favorable to insurers in the State of Florida.

Scarborough Attorneys at Law

About the Author Scarborough Attorneys At Law is more than a law firm. It is a
resource of unique attorneys who are committed to providing
each client with the highest caliber of legal representation available.